Extraordinary Genius

1469. Chapter 1469 This is what I said

Recently, many people on the Internet are slamming me and saying that I have disturbed the industry order. So what is the industry order?

Industry order, I think it should include a variety of technical market order, talent market order, business market order, investment development order and so on. I am not an expert. I can’t say the professional nouns. I will talk about my views from the perspective of consumers today.

As a consumer of IT products, I use the most intuitive computer as an example. I want to buy a computer, there are two ways to order online and buy in a physical store.

To use a computer, in addition to buying this computer, I also need to install the software I need to use.

So I plan to buy a computer, the cost is 6,000 yuan, I have a computer with a price of 5999, but when I actually buy it, the cost will be higher than this.

Because I have to install software, the most basic, I have to install the system. There are two options for this mainstream, one is the Lenovo-Silver Mountain Corporation XOS CD and Microsoft’s VISTA CD.

The former retail price 499 yuan RMB, if it is a pre-installed system, then the price should be 199 yuan. And what about Microsoft? The retail price is several times, even if it is a pre-installed system, the price is close to 1,000 yuan.

This is not that you have to buy a desktop computer, you usually need a patch panel, you need a network cable, you also need to install the network, these related products, is a sum of money.

So the money we actually buy from the computer = computer cost + software price + shop cost + accessory price + profit

What is the real cost of a computer inside? What is the profit? Who earned the biggest profit?

The rent of the store, the profit of the agent, the profit of the PC manufacturer, the profit of the software manufacturer… There are too many people who divide the money.

Who is the highest profit margin? Microsoft.

The Microsoft is called the development of VISTA, which has invested billions of dollars, but where does this billions of dollars come from? Selling XP system earned, they rely on the XP system to make profits, enough to develop VISTA and XP a dozen times!

Bill? Gates’s wealth comes from all, Microsoft. What about my wealth? From a variety of investments, the profits from IT investments are not big in all my income.

I only invest in a lot of industries, each of which can bring in a little profit in the future. When combined, it will increase my income a lot.

Having said that, as consumers, we all want to buy the products at a lower price. However, as a producer and seller, it is hoped that the profit will be high enough.

How to form a balance between the two, I think it is best to use the concept of supermarkets. Simply put, it is small profits but quick turnover.

I want to build a computer industry with small profits but quick turnover. Whether it is hardware or software, manufacturers must have profits, but the profit of single products should not be so high.

Now I have invested in various hardware accessories, invested in software, and invested in PC manufacturers, which is to give consumers a reasonable price.

And what about the results? I touched the interests of those manufacturers. They joined forces, attacked me, slandered me, and said that I am destroying the order of the industry.

Keeping high profits, even if the products can’t be sold, they won’t sell at a reduced price. Is this their order?

Define computers as high-end electronics, not ordinary household appliances. Is this their order?

Some people cut prices and give profits to consumers, is it against the order?

If these are what they call industry order, then I have to say that the company I invest in will not follow these “orders”!

They made the order a shackle, wanted to lock other companies, lock the profits, let the consumers follow them, and let the consumers stay in the dark.

I am going to break this shackle, break the order, and re-establish a new, rational order!

Many people used Bill Gates as an example, dropped out of school and established a huge Microsoft emperor, but if there was no Paul Allen, how could Bill Sates be successful?

And many people may not be very clear, Bill Gates’s mother, who was a friend of IBM’s Chairman and CEO, worked together as an executive at an intercontinental bank.

That’s why Bill Gates’ original software, why can it be sold to IBM, why Microsoft’s DOS was able to get IBM’s promotion and, with the help of IBM, became the industry standard.

Going to school and doing business does not conflict with itself. I finished my studies, so today I am able to surpass Bill Gates in wealth.

Those who drop out of school as a golden rule and think that the world is not waiting for people are blinded by this story. I don’t deny that Bill Gates is good, but don’t forget that Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer, who started out with him, didn’t have their efforts. Without the help of Bill mother, there would be no Microsoft today.

What I want to say is that Bill Gates is not a good role model, our youngster, don’t learn, unless your mother has an unparalleled background.

Let’s talk about Intel, which has always advertised its products as the best in the world, but with the witness of hundreds of media around the world, their products have been defeated by Advanced Micro Devices.

We should be aware that the larger the output of most standard products, the lower the cost should be. However, Intel’s output is obviously higher than that of Superweek. Its performance is the same as that of Superwealth. It is not even as good as Superweek, but the price is much higher.

So relatively speaking, Intel’s profits will be much higher.

The price of Chaowei at this time can guarantee normal profit. It is said that Intel should be higher at the same price. If not, then there are only two possibilities.

First, Intel is lying. Second, Intel’s technology is not as good as Super. As for which one, I am also very curious.

If Intel lie, then their profits are huge profits. If Intel doesn’t lie, then their technology development is really not as good as Advanced Micro Devices.

Here I would like to ask the representative of Intel, which one of my guesses is correct? Or is there a third possibility, and both?

There are also PC manufacturers who are constantly attacking the Lenovo Group, why, because their products are not as cost-effective as Lenovo models. Their 10,000-dollar laptop is worse than Lenovo’s $8,000.

They didn’t want to lower their selling price, but instead asked the Lenovo Group to raise the price. Frankly speaking, the Lenovo Group’s selling price has increased, although the sales volume may be reduced, but the profit of the single item has increased a lot, and the Lenovo Group may earn more.

But we don’t have such a choice. We have chosen to allow more consumers to buy computers at reasonable prices. We want to make computers an ordinary household product rather than a so-called high-end electronic product.

These are the words I want to say today, the conscience of a conscientious company!

……